On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:12:28 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 06:07:14PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2026 10:31:51 -0700 Zack McKevitt wrote: > > > + type: u64 > > > > prefer uint and then no pad > > same here, u64 aligns with hardware definition why uint should be desired? > I noticed the review prompts, I fail to agree because we need predictability > and align with hardware definitions.
Just because u64 is defined to be aligned and require the padding. uint is a "modern u64"
