On 10/16/26 7:20 AM, Abhinav Parihar wrote: > Context bank 9 is reserved for secure use cases and must not be exposed > as a FastRPC compute context bank for non-secure offloading.
The lack of a platform name in the commit message and a split over that suggests this is a universal truth for all Qualcomm platforms, yet the patch only limits this to some of those who currently define a cb@9. Please make it more clear which one is intended. > Remove the compute-cb@9 nodes from the Lemans and Monaco device trees to > prevent clients from selecting a secure context bank for normal FastRPC > workloads. > > Secure use case support is not currently implemented upstream. Ordering this sentence before the previous paragraph would make the commit message read more naturally Konrad
