Hey,

On 9/18/26 11:44, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 18/09/2026 09:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 2026-07-09 13:36:57 [+0200], Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> Hey,
>> Hi Maarten,
>>
>>> Yeah the problem was similar, I believe neither check should exist,
>>> instead the caller should give this information like the comment mentions.
>>
>> Any update here? Maybe I have been left out on reposts. Any chance this
>> gets in before the LTS of this year gets out?
> 
> Side question, there was a bunch of sashiko issues against v4 - have those 
> been addressed?
> 
> As today it is the first time I see patch 7/7 which is a bit of a scary one. 
> I have to ask how much does Intel commit to fixing out any potential breakage 
> given the status of i915?
> 
> + other maintainers FYI
Patch 7/7 addresses a real issue, it just happened to be more easily found on 
PREEMPT_RT.

I haven't had much time to look at PREEMPT_RT lately, I'll see if I can get 
some time to look at
sashiko, but lack of reviews have not been helping.

Every time I send out revised patches, it takes a few months before I receive a 
response.
By that time I have moved on to other projects, and finding time takes a lot of 
time again.
If the cycle took only a few days I could finish this quickly and get it merged.

Kind regards,
~Maarten Lankhorst

Reply via email to