On Die, 2011-10-25 at 22:40 -0400, Ilija Hadzic wrote: > it's better that radeon_crtc_commit and radeon_crtc_prepare call > crtc-specific dpms functions instead of hard-coding them to > radeon_crtc_dpms.
Is it really better? If it's always radeon_crtc_dpms anyway, this obfuscates that fact (and introduces a guaranteed branch prediction miss, but that probably doesn't matter here). -- Earthling Michel D?nzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
