LGTM. Thanks.

On 9/2/2026 5:19 AM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Sashiko recommended some additional checks to prevent null pointer
> access. Check for revoked states inside perf_event_read_local(), as
> the pmu event may have already been freed at this point. Add a null
> check inside __perf_event_read_cpu() as well before accessing the pmu
> ptr.
>
> Cc: Dapeng Mi <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index f19d27ac411d..bb90034a2054 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4788,14 +4788,19 @@ static inline const struct cpumask 
> *perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(unsigned int
>  
>  static int __perf_event_read_cpu(struct perf_event *event, int event_cpu)
>  {
> +     struct pmu *pmu = READ_ONCE(event->pmu);
>       int local_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>       u16 local_pkg, event_pkg;
>  
>       if ((unsigned)event_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>               return event_cpu;
>  
> +     if (!pmu)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
>       if (event->group_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_READ_SCOPE) {
> -             const struct cpumask *cpumask = 
> perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(event->pmu->scope, event_cpu);
> +             const struct cpumask *cpumask = 
> perf_scope_cpu_topology_cpumask(pmu->scope,
> +                                                                             
> event_cpu);
>  
>               if (cpumask && cpumask_test_cpu(local_cpu, cpumask))
>                       return local_cpu;
> @@ -4917,6 +4922,11 @@ int perf_event_read_local(struct perf_event *event, 
> u64 *value,
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> +     if (READ_ONCE(event->state) <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_REVOKED) {
> +             ret = -ENODEV;
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
>       /*
>        * Get the event CPU numbers, and adjust them to local if the event is
>        * a per-package event that can be read locally

Reply via email to