On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:14:07 +0200 Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:05:54AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:05:14 +0200 > > ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote: > > > > > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > > > > Swapping the handle/offset indexes is enough to support such formats. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > > Not sure we want this or not, but dropping these wouldn't remove any > > > functionality. > > > > What if your surfaces are packed into a single bo? It would be a pain > > to move them around in that case... > > That's what offset[] is for, no? Oh duh, yes it is. I confused myself by adding both per-plane bits and then multi-object bits. :) -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20111117/b9b9b27a/attachment.pgp>
