On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Mandeep Singh Baines <msb at chromium.org> wrote: > David Rientjes (rientjes at google.com) wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, David Rientjes wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: >> > >> > > From: Hugh Dickins <hughd at chromium.org> >> > > >> > > Add a check for panic_timeout in the drm_fb_helper_panic() notifier: if >> > > we're going to reboot immediately, the user will not be able to see the >> > > messages anyway, and messing with the video mode may display artifacts, >> > > and certainly get into several layers of complexity (including mutexes >> > > and >> > > memory allocations) which we shall be much safer to avoid. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com> >> > > [ Edited commit message and modified to short-circuit panic_timeout < 0 >> > > ? instead of testing panic_timeout >= 0. ?-Mandeep ] >> > > Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb at chromium.org> >> > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> >> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> >> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org >> > >> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com> >> > >> >> Dave, where do we stand on this? ?I haven't seen it hit Linus' tree and I >> don't see it in git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.
I've just pulled it into my local drm-next, thanks for reminding me. Dave.
