On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 12:28:07PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) 
> to consider:
> - [Low] Introduction of the legacy, non-standard `interface-pix-fmt` property 
> for a standard hardware concept (parallel bus width), violating modern DT 
> principles.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v1 1/4] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add interface pixel format 
> ---
> commit 7225ea545d2ff50540972dd75d375b8ecea4f315
> Author: Francesco Dolcini <[email protected]>
>
> dt-bindings: lcdif: Add interface pixel format
>
> This commit updates the fsl,lcdif device tree binding to support the
> interface-pix-fmt property. The property is used to describe the hardware's
> parallel data bus transfer width to match board wiring and prevent shifted
> colors.
>
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> > index 2dd0411ec6516..209ee5a96e393 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> > @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - const: rx
> >
> > +  interface-pix-fmt:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> > +    enum:
> > +      - rgb24
> > +      - rgb565
> > +      - rgb666
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Is this introducing a legacy, non-standard property into the new schema ABI?
>
> Standard devicetree guidelines usually prefer endpoint properties like
> bus-width (defined in video-interfaces.yaml) to describe physical parallel
> data line configurations, such as setting bus-width = <18> for RGB666.

Make sense, can we use standard property?

Frank

>
> If a custom property is strictly necessary here rather than using the standard
> endpoint properties, does this require a vendor prefix like
> fsl,interface-pix-fmt to comply with modern devicetree naming conventions?
>
> > +
> >    interrupts:
> >      items:
> >        - description: LCDIF DMA interrupt
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review ยท 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1

Reply via email to