On 2026-07-09 11:53:52 [+0200], Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Hello Sebastian, Hi Maarten,
> The test results are available, mostly looks good except 1 spurious > incomplete. > > I tried reproducing it, but was unable to. It seems that pre-existing > incompletes > on the specific IGT testcase already happened before the changes. > > Do you want to review the patches you didn't author, so I can move forward? > Even if you are uncomfortable to review the signalers_lock changes, it should > be possible to have the rest reviewed and merged upstream. This looks good to me. The condition in 5/7 is the as in 3/7. Not sure if this should be merged into a helper or if it should be passed from the caller. But it seems the information of the calling context is lost. Please move forward ;) > Kind regards, > ~Maarten Lankhorst Sebastian
