On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:29:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I've discussed this a bit on irc and consensus seems to be "some ugliness > due to interface impendance mistmatches in the kernel? who cares ...". I > agree that there's not a fundamental problem with fourcc and planar yuv > that can't be fixed with a bunch of boilerplate code with the assorted set > of inconsistencies between drivers. So if this is the general consensus > I'll just look the other way, shut down my shields an recall my battle > ship out of LEO ... ;-) Rob, Joonyoung, Inkie, any comment on using fourcc vs rolling our own surface definitions? Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20111103/4b4ae914/attachment.pgp>
