Hi Devarsh, Thanks, that sounds great -- let's converge on panel-ssd16xx.c.
> Yes, I will be adding SSD1677 controller support in V2 of my series, > hopefully that should help and after that it's just a matter of adding > panel entry for your pixpaper panel. I can share you my branch with > ssd1677 support once I have it ready. That would be very helpful, please do share the branch once it's ready. I have the PIXPAPER 4.26 hardware here, so I can validate the SSD1677 support and the panel on real hardware and report back any quirks. > additionally I can quickly add boilerplate pixpaper 4.26 panel entries on > top of my V2 series referring from your patch so that it switches to using > standard ssd16xx commands and ssd1677 quirks wherever necessary and you can > then validate and modify. Thanks for offering. If it's alright with you, I'd like to take the pixpaper-426m panel entry through review myself on top of your series, using your boilerplate as a starting point, since I can carry the validation on real hardware. I'll credit your help with Co-developed-by/Suggested-by as appropriate. Happy to arrange it whichever way is easiest for you. I'll also follow up with the 0xF7/0xFF test result so we can capture the correct SSD1677 update-sequence quirk. Regards, LiangCheng
