> -----Original Message-----
> From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Biju
> Das
> Sent: 17 March 2026 20:11
> To: Hugo Villeneuve <[email protected]>
> Cc: biju.das.au <[email protected]>; Maarten Lankhorst
> <[email protected]>; Maxime
> Ripard <[email protected]>; Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>; David
> Airlie
> <[email protected]>; Simona Vetter <[email protected]>; Philipp Zabel
> <[email protected]>; dri-
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Geert
> Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>; Chris Brandt
> <[email protected]>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi: Fix the power-on
> sequence
>
> Hi Hugo,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> > Hugo Villeneuve
> > Sent: 17 March 2026 19:50
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi: Fix the
> > power-on sequence
> >
> > Hi Biju,
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 19:37:35 +0000
> > Biju Das <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hugo,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On
> > > > Behalf Of Hugo Villeneuve
> > > > Sent: 17 March 2026 18:52
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi: Fix the
> > > > power-on sequence
> > > >
> > > > Hi Biju,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:36:05 +0000 Biju Das
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Hugo,
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On
> > > > > > Behalf Of Hugo Villeneuve
> > > > > > Sent: 17 March 2026 16:13
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi: Fix the
> > > > > > power-on sequence
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Biju,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:45:29 +0000 Biju Das
> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Hugo,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: dri-devel <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > On Behalf Of Hugo Villeneuve
> > > > > > > > Sent: 17 March 2026 15:21
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi: Fix
> > > > > > > > the power-on sequence
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Biju,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:13:07 +0000 Biju Das
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi Hugo,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > > > From: dri-devel
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> > > > > > > > > > Hugo Villeneuve
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: 17 March 2026 15:01
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: renesas: rzg2l_mipi_dsi:
> > > > > > > > > > Fix the power-on sequence
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi Biju,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:36:01 +0000 Biju
> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > From: Biju Das <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Move reset_control_deassert() and
> > > > > > > > > > > reset_control_assert() from
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_init()/rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_exit(
> > > > > > > > > > > )
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > atomic_pre_enable() and atomic_post_disable()
> > > > > > > > > > > respectively, and move
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_set_display_timing() from
> > > > > > > > > > > atomic_pre_enable() to atomic_enable(), to align
> > > > > > > > > > > with the power-on sequence described in Figure 34.5
> > > > > > > > > > > of section
> > > > > > > > > > > "34.4.2.1 Reset" of the RZ/G2L hardware manual
> > > > > > > > > > > Rev.1.50 May 2025.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > According to the hardware manual, LINK registers
> > > > > > > > > > > must be written before deasserting CMN_RSTB, and the
> > > > > > > > > > > 1ms delay is retained in
> > > > > > > > > > > atomic_pre_enable() after the deassert.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Seems to me like this should be backported to stable
> > > > > > > > > > branches (missing Fixes / Cc: stable
> > > > > > tags)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OK, will add fixes/stable tags.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > .../gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c | 27
> > > > > > > > > > > +++++++++++--------
> > > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > diff --git
> > > > > > > > > > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> > > > > > > > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> > > > > > > > > > > index e53b48e4de56..9053ce037b75 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_mipi_dsi.c
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static int
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_init(struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi
> *dsi,
> > > > > > > > > > > u32 dphytim1;
> > > > > > > > > > > u32 dphytim2;
> > > > > > > > > > > u32 dphytim3;
> > > > > > > > > > > - int ret;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > /* All DSI global operation timings are set with
> > > > > > > > > > > recommended setting */
> > > > > > > > > > > for (i = 0; i <
> > > > > > > > > > > ARRAY_SIZE(rzg2l_mipi_dsi_global_timings);
> > > > > > > > > > > ++i) { @@
> > > > > > > > > > > -524,12 +523,6 @@ static int
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_init(struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, DSIDPHYTIM2, dphytim2);
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, DSIDPHYTIM3,
> > > > > > > > > > > dphytim3);
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - ret = reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc);
> > > > > > > > > > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > > > > > > - return ret;
> > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > - fsleep(1000);
> > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > return 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > @@ -541,8 +534,6 @@ static void
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_exit(struct rzg2l_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > dphyctrl0 &= ~(DSIDPHYCTRL0_EN_LDO1200 |
> > > > > > > > > > > DSIDPHYCTRL0_EN_BGR);
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, DSIDPHYCTRL0,
> > > > > > > > > > > dphyctrl0);
> > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > - reset_control_assert(dsi->rstc);
> > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > static int rzg2l_dphy_conf_clks(struct
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi *dsi, unsigned long mode_freq, @@
> > > > > > > > > > > -1030,24 +1021,37 @@ static void
> > > > > > > > > > > rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_pre_enable(struct
> > > > > > > > > > drm_bridge *bridge,
> > > > > > > > > > > connector =
> > > > > > > > > > > drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(state,
> > > > > > > > > > > bridge->encoder);
> > > > > > > > > > > crtc = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state,
> > > > > > > > > > > connector)->crtc;
> > > > > > > > > > > mode = &drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> > > > > > > > > > > crtc)->adjusted_mode;
> > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This is not related to your commit message (coding style
> > > > > > > > > > change).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ack. Will restore it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ret = rzg2l_mipi_dsi_startup(dsi, mode);
> > > > > > > > > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > > > > > > return;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > - rzg2l_mipi_dsi_set_display_timing(dsi, mode);
> > > > > > > > > > > + ret = reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc);
> > > > > > > > > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > > > > > > > > + return;
> > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > + if (dsi->rstc)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This seems new and not documented in the commit message? Is
> > > > > > > > > > this a fix?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > RZ/V2H does not need this as it uses different IP.
> > > > > > > > > Previously
> > > > > > > > > fsleep() is in RZ/G2L specific function. I will update
> > > > > > > > > commit description for this
> > change.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Suggestion: maybe move this to a separate patch, to facilitate
> > > > > > > > review/understanding...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The only way is to introduce a new callback to handle it for
> > > > > > > RZ/G2L SoC.
> > > > > > > Then we won't be able to apply fixes tag as it is not fixing
> > > > > > > anything.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am not sure what you mean by that callback? How a callback
> > > > > > is needed only if you split the
> > > > patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > You cannot split the patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Before:
> > > > > atomic_pre_enable():
> > > > > startup()
> > > > > dphy_init()
> > > > > write DSIDPHYTIMx (F) PHY timing regs
> > > > > reset_control_deassert() (G) deassert CMN_RSTB
> > > > > udelay(1) (H)
> > > > > setting below link registers
> > > > > − TXSETR
> > > > > − ULPSSETR
> > > > > − DSISETR
> > > > > − CLSTPTSETR
> > > > > − LPTRNSTSETR
> > > > >
> > > > > Current patch:
> > > > >
> > > > > atomic_pre_enable():
> > > > > startup()
> > > > > dphy_init()
> > > > > write DSIDPHYTIMx (F) PHY timing regs
> > > > > setting below link registers
> > > > > − TXSETR
> > > > > − ULPSSETR
> > > > > − DSISETR
> > > > > − CLSTPTSETR
> > > > > − LPTRNSTSETR
> > > > >
> > > > > reset_control_deassert() (G) deassert CMN_RSTB
> > > > > fsleep(1000) (H)
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this original patch you test for the validity of dsi->rstc
> > > > > > to determine if you apply the delay or not. So in the case of
> > > > > > RZ/V2H, I understand that it is
> > NULL?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, that is correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Currently this is optional reset, and it is no-op for RZ/V2H.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this means that the call to
> > > > > > reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc) should not occur for
> > RZ/V2H?
> > > > >
> > > > > reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc) will return immediately as it is
> > > > > null.
> > > > >
> > > > > or
> > > > >
> > > > > We could add this check instead
> > > > >
> > > > > if (dsi->rstc) {
> > > > > ret = reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc);
> > > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > > return;
> > > > >
> > > > > fsleep(1000);
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Yes, like Tommaso suggested.
> > > >
> > > > But I don't see why you cannot simply implement (split) this
> > > > change as a separate commit just after commit #1, or after commit #2?
> > > >
> > > > This seems like an optimization for RZ/V2H, so I think it doesnt
> > > > really matter if it does not go to stable branches?
> > >
> > > Previously RZ/V2H do not call reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc) as
> > > it is called from SoC-specific function.
> >
> > Ok, so this change could be split, if you want, as commit #3. This
> > would make commit #2 easier to understand IMHO.
>
>
> atomic_pre_enable():
> startup()
> dphy_init() -> SoC specific
> write DSIDPHYTIMx (F) PHY timing regs
>
> The below calls are in common path. So, no way you can split.
> setting below link registers
> − TXSETR
> − ULPSSETR
> − DSISETR
> − CLSTPTSETR
> − LPTRNSTSETR
> reset_control_deassert() (G) deassert CMN_RSTB
> fsleep(1000) (H)
>
> Patch#1 1usec to 1 msec
> Patch#2 Move rzg2l_mipi_dsi_set_display_timing() to
> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable()
> after starting hs clock.
> Patch#3 Move reset assert/deassert from rzg2l_mipi_dsi_dphy_{init, exit} to
> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_pre_enable and
> rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_post_disable,
> with a guard for RZ/V2H by checking (dsi->rstc), as it is in the
> common path.
> Like previous case assert/deassert won't be called.
>
> Are you OK?
I will send next version like below:
Patch#1 1usec to 1 msec
Patch#2 Move rzg2l_mipi_dsi_set_display_timing() to
rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_enable()
after starting hs clock.
Patch#3 Move reset_deassert from phy_init to rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_pre_enable()
with below change
if (dsi->rstc) {
ret = reset_control_deassert(dsi->rstc);
if (ret < 0)
return;
fsleep(1000);
}
Patch#4 Move reset_assert from phy_exit to rzg2l_mipi_dsi_atomic_post_disable()
to make
the balanced operations.
Cheers,
Biju
