On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 01:56:10PM +0100, Petr Tesarik wrote: > I don't want to start a bikeshedding discussion, so if everyone else > likes this name, let's keep it. But maybe the "_CC" (meaning > Confidential Comptuing) is not necessary. IIUC it's the same concept as > set_page_encrypted(), set_page_decrypted(), which does not refer to > CoCo either.
Frankly I hate that AMD got their "encrypted" "decrypted" naming baked into the CC related APIs. I'm not at all convinced that they "do not refer to CoCo" in the way Linux uses them and other arches absolutely make them 100% tied to coco. If we are going to bikeshed the name it should be DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Jason
