On 2/26/26 06:56, Yujie Liu wrote: > [Some people who received this message don't often get email from > [email protected]. Learn why this is important at > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 07:06:25PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 11:00:32AM +0800, Yujie Liu wrote: >>> Warning: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c:1351 function parameter 'svm_pages' >>> not described in 'drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked' >>> Warning: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpusvm.c:1351 expecting prototype for >>> drm_gpusvm_range_pages_valid_unlocked(). Prototype was for >>> drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() instead >>> >>> Fixes: 6364afd532bc ("drm/gpusvm: refactor core API to use pages struct") >> >> I fix this one already. Believe it merged yesterday. > > Thanks. I will drop this patch and respin the series after waiting > briefly for possible comments on other patches.
I also strongly suggest to split that patch set up by driver/subsystem and send it out individually. So that we can upstream it through different branches. When it is send out as one patch set then that usually indicates that in needs to be applied in that order. That is clearly not the case here, but it would be nice to have it separately in my inbox. Apart from that, thanks for taking care of that. Christian. > > Yujie > >> >> 74b6e83942dc drm/gpusvm: Fix drm_gpusvm_pages_valid_unlocked() kernel-doc >> >> Matt
