On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 12:30 PM Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just checked and there shouldn't be any conflicts, so if you want to pick > this > one up as well, please do. :) > > Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]>
Will, do thanks! > Given that klint can do quite some convinient extra checks, should we consider > making it an optional part of the build? Similar to what we do with clippy? Yeah, that is the goal (e.g. `KLINT=1` or similar eventually). But if someone wants to run it, it is already possible, IIUC Andreas already did the other day. To make things easier for developers/maintainers, I asked Nathan the other day if we could have them in the LLVM+Rust kernel.org toolchains, and he was supportive on adding it there when Gary is ready, so it may be straightforward to set up in CIs! :) (And later on, ideally, even on linux-next when we things are more settled) Cheers, Miguel
