Hi Christian, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next daeinki-drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm/drm-next drm-tip/drm-tip next-20260114] [cannot apply to drm-i915/for-linux-next drm-i915/for-linux-next-fixes linus/master v6.19-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-K-nig/dma-buf-add-dma_fence_is_initialized-function/20260114-001656 base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260113152125.47380-6-christian.koenig%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH 05/10] dma-buf: inline spinlock for fence protection v4 config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/[email protected]/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260114/[email protected]/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c:151:29: error: no member named >> 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 151 | lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock); | ~~~~~ ^ include/linux/lockdep.h:392:46: note: expanded from macro 'lockdep_assert_held' 392 | #define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { (void)(l); } while (0) | ^ 1 error generated. -- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1048:27: error: no member named 'lock' in >> 'struct dma_fence' 1048 | spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); | ~~~~~ ^ include/linux/spinlock.h:381:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave' 381 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/spinlock.h:244:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave' 244 | flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \ | ^~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1050:26: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1050 | spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); | ~~~~ ^ include/linux/spinlock.h:366:38: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_nested' 366 | raw_spin_lock_nested(spinlock_check(lock), subclass); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/spinlock.h:235:37: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_nested' 235 | _raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock))) | ^~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1064:22: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1064 | spin_unlock(prev->lock); | ~~~~ ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1067:33: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1067 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); | ~~~~~ ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1072:28: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1072 | spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); | ~~~~~ ^ include/linux/spinlock.h:381:39: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_irqsave' 381 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_check(lock), flags); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/spinlock.h:244:34: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_irqsave' 244 | flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \ | ^~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1074:27: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1074 | spin_lock_nested(prev->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); | ~~~~ ^ include/linux/spinlock.h:366:38: note: expanded from macro 'spin_lock_nested' 366 | raw_spin_lock_nested(spinlock_check(lock), subclass); \ | ^~~~ include/linux/spinlock.h:235:37: note: expanded from macro 'raw_spin_lock_nested' 235 | _raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock))) | ^~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1091:21: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1091 | spin_unlock(prev->lock); /* serialise with prev->cb_list */ | ~~~~ ^ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:1094:32: error: no member named 'lock' in 'struct dma_fence' 1094 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); | ~~~~~ ^ 8 errors generated. vim +151 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 144 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 145 static void f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17 146 __dma_fence_signal__notify(struct dma_fence *fence, f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17 147 const struct list_head *list) 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 148 { 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 149 struct dma_fence_cb *cur, *tmp; 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 150 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 @151 lockdep_assert_held(fence->lock); 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 152 f2cb60e9a3881e Chris Wilson 2019-08-17 153 list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, list, node) { 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 154 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur->node); 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 155 cur->func(fence, cur); 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 156 } 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 157 } 0152b3b3f49b36 Chris Wilson 2019-05-08 158 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
