Hi,
Le samedi 01 novembre 2025 à 00:02 +0800, Jason-JH Lin a écrit : > To facilitate the removal of the shift_pa parameter from > cmdq_pkt_jump_rel(), current users of cmdq_pkt_jump_rel() need to > transition to using cmdq_pkt_jump_rel_temp() before the API change > is implemented. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH Lin <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c > index d0b0b072f953..5fc9263ccb78 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-cmdq.c > @@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static struct mdp_cmdq_cmd *mdp_cmdq_prepare(struct > mdp_dev *mdp, > goto err_free_path; > } > cmdq_pkt_eoc(&cmd->pkt); > - cmdq_pkt_jump_rel(&cmd->pkt, CMDQ_INST_SIZE, > mdp->cmdq_shift_pa[pp_idx]); > + cmdq_pkt_jump_rel_temp(&cmd->pkt, CMDQ_INST_SIZE, > mdp->cmdq_shift_pa[pp_idx]); I cannot take that right now in the media tree, as it won't build. Can the SoC maintainer help me know if I just leave that on hold, or perhaps you'd like to take it ? (or its in next, and I just have to wait for next udpate?) I also doubt patch 4/5 is make much of a difference without the soc changes ? regards, Nicolas > > for (i = 0; i < num_comp; i++) { > s32 inner_id = MDP_COMP_NONE;
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
