On 12/7/25 13:39, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Nowaday task->group_leader->mm != task->mm is only possible if
> a) task is not a group leader and b) task->group_leader->mm == NULL
> because task->group_leader has already exited using sys_exit().

Just for my understanding: That is because CLONE_THREAD can only be specified 
together with CLONE_SIGHAND and CLONE_VM, correct?

> 
> I don't think that drm/amd tries to detect/nack this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Seems to make sense of hand.

Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>

Should we pick that one up or do you want to merge it upstream somehow?

Regards,
Christian.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c   |  3 ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 10 ----------
>  2 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index a0f8ba382b9e..e44f158a11f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -2551,9 +2551,6 @@ void amdgpu_vm_set_task_info(struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>       vm->task_info->task.pid = current->pid;
>       get_task_comm(vm->task_info->task.comm, current);
>  
> -     if (current->group_leader->mm != current->mm)
> -             return;
> -
>       vm->task_info->tgid = current->tgid;
>       get_task_comm(vm->task_info->process_name, current->group_leader);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> index a085faac9fe1..f8ef18a3aa71 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
> @@ -833,12 +833,6 @@ struct kfd_process *kfd_create_process(struct 
> task_struct *thread)
>       if (!(thread->mm && mmget_not_zero(thread->mm)))
>               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> -     /* Only the pthreads threading model is supported. */
> -     if (thread->group_leader->mm != thread->mm) {
> -             mmput(thread->mm);
> -             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -     }
> -
>       /* If the process just called exec(3), it is possible that the
>        * cleanup of the kfd_process (following the release of the mm
>        * of the old process image) is still in the cleanup work queue.
> @@ -918,10 +912,6 @@ struct kfd_process *kfd_get_process(const struct 
> task_struct *thread)
>       if (!thread->mm)
>               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
> -     /* Only the pthreads threading model is supported. */
> -     if (thread->group_leader->mm != thread->mm)
> -             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
>       process = find_process(thread, false);
>       if (!process)
>               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Reply via email to