* Sedat Dilek (sedat.dilek at googlemail.com) wrote: > [ As I am not subscribed to both MLs and lazy to pick up all involved people ] > > Hi Chris, > > The original patch had also this part (see the revert in [1]): > ... > +#include <linux/security.h> > ... > > Your new patch in [2] is missing it or is it not required?
It was just a patch on top of the bad commit (47970b1b), the #include is required. thanks, -chris
