On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 03:41:56AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 09:28:52PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote: > > 2 or more SSPPs and dual-DSI interface are need for super wide panel. > > And 4 DSC are preferred for power optimal in this case due to width > > limitation of SSPP and MDP clock rate constrain. This patch set > > extends number of pipes to 4 and revise related mixer blending logic > > to support quad pipe. All these changes depends on the virtual plane > > feature to split a super wide drm plane horizontally into 2 or more sub > > clip. Thus DMA of multiple SSPPs can share the effort of fetching the > > whole drm plane. > > > > The first pipe pair co-work with the first mixer pair to cover the left > > half of screen and 2nd pair of pipes and mixers are for the right half > > of screen. If a plane is only for the right half of screen, only one > > or two of pipes in the 2nd pipe pair are valid, and no SSPP or mixer is > > assinged for invalid pipe. > > > > For those panel that does not require quad-pipe, only 1 or 2 pipes in > > the 1st pipe pair will be used. There is no concept of right half of > > screen. > > > > For legacy non virtual plane mode, the first 1 or 2 pipes are used for > > the single SSPP and its multi-rect mode. > > > > Changes in v16: > > - Rebase to latest branch msm-next-lumag. > > - Fix IGT test failures. > > - Drop patches that have been merged. > > - Link to v15: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250819-v6-16-rc2-quad-pipe-upstream-v15-0-2c7a85089...@linaro.org > > Thanks. It's too invasive and too late for 6.18, but I've started the > test run at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/msm/-/merge_requests/191
JFYI: this has passed the IGT testing, so it will be picked up soon after 6.18-rc1. -- With best wishes Dmitry
