On Tue, 16 Sep 2025, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 11:01:00AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > On 11-Sep-25 10:15 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2025, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote: > > > > > >> From: Hans de Goede <ha...@kernel.org> > > >> > > >> Add 'name' argument to of_led_get() such that it can lookup LEDs in > > >> devicetree by either name or index. > > >> > > >> And use this modified function to add devicetree support to the generic > > >> (non devicetree specific) [devm_]led_get() function. > > >> > > >> This uses the standard devicetree pattern of adding a -names string array > > >> to map names to the indexes for an array of resources. > > >> > > >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> > > >> Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <l...@kernel.org> > > > > > > Remind me why this can't go in through LED again? > > > > I don't think anyone has discussed how to merge this yet. > > > > I believe that the LED tree is the correct tree to merge this > > entire series through, once the DT bits have been reviewed. > > > > Unless there are some strong reasons (that I'm failing to spot), we > should merge the DeviceTree binding and implementation through the LED > tree. Then I merge the DTS change through the Qualcomm DT tree once the > bindings are available in linux-next.
1-3 have been applied to the LED tree already. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
