On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:11 PM Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 12:47 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > On 9/9/25 12:39 PM, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > > On 9/8/25 14:20, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > > On 9/8/25 2:11 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:11:32 +0200 > > > > > "Danilo Krummrich" <d...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > No, drivers can't iterate the evict/extobj lists directly; or > > > > > > at least this is > > > > > > not intended by GPUVM's API and if drivers do so, this is > > > > > > considered peeking > > > > > > into GPUVM internals, so drivers are on their own anyways. > > > > > > > > > > > > Iterators, such as for_each_vm_bo_in_list() are not exposed > > > > > > to drivers. > > > > > Okay, that's a good thing. I thought Xe was doing some funky > > > > > stuff with > > > > > the list... > > > > Maybe, I don't know. If they do so, the should send patches > > > > adding the > > > > corresponding iterators and provide a rationale why drivers need > > > > to access those > > > > lists directly and why we can't provide an API that handles the > > > > overall > > > > use-case, such as drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects(), etc. > > > > > > We're using the drm_gpuvm_*for_each* macros in drm_gpuvm.h, > > > assuming from name > > > and docs they are driver api. > > > > > > Also the drm_gem_for_each_gpuvm_bo(), although this usage could > > > easily be > > > converted to a helper. > > > > We were talking about the extobj/evict lists, the ones you mention > > are fine of > > course. :) > > > > Hmm. Now on closer inspection it looks like we're checking for evict > list empty, It looks like rebinding after validation may in theory > evict some bos to system memory and then we'd rerun the validation step > if the evict list was not empty. > > We could of course add a helper for that or if there are better > suggestions to handle that situation, that'd be fine as well.
I don't think evict list empty means that there are no evicted GEMs. It's possible for an extobj to be missing from the evict list in some scenarios. That's why drm_gpuvm_prepare_objects_locked() checks evicted on the extobj list to ensure that the evicted list is up-to-date when you call into drm_gpuvm_validate_locked(). Alice