On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 12:52:57PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 6:54 AM JST, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > Out of broad need for these macros in Rust, move them out. Several folks > > have shown interest (Nova, Tyr GPU drivers). > > > > bitstruct - defines bitfields in Rust structs similar to C. > > register - support for defining hardware registers and accessors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagn...@nvidia.com> > <snip> > > > diff --git a/rust/kernel/lib.rs b/rust/kernel/lib.rs > > index c859a8984bae..9c492fa10967 100644 > > --- a/rust/kernel/lib.rs > > +++ b/rust/kernel/lib.rs > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ > > #[cfg(CONFIG_AUXILIARY_BUS)] > > pub mod auxiliary; > > pub mod bits; > > +pub mod bitstruct; > > #[cfg(CONFIG_BLOCK)] > > pub mod block; > > pub mod bug; > > @@ -112,6 +113,7 @@ > > pub mod prelude; > > pub mod print; > > pub mod rbtree; > > +pub mod register; > > I remember a discussion with Danilo where he mentioned the register > macro should end up being in `kernel::io::register`.
I talked with Danilo, and I moved it to io for next revision. > Also wondering whether `bitstruct` should not be in the > appropriately-named `bits` module standing right above it. :) I think now that I renamed it to bitfield, I'll move it to bits. That does make a lot of sense. thanks, - Joel
