On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 12:01:18AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > We're allocating a higher-order page from the buddy. For these pages > (that are guaranteed to not exceed a single memory section) there is no > need to use nth_page(). > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Oh hello! Now it all comes together :) nth_tag(): LGTM, so: Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoa...@oracle.com> > --- > mm/percpu-km.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/percpu-km.c b/mm/percpu-km.c > index fe31aa19db81a..4efa74a495cb6 100644 > --- a/mm/percpu-km.c > +++ b/mm/percpu-km.c > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static struct pcpu_chunk *pcpu_create_chunk(gfp_t gfp) > } > > for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) > - pcpu_set_page_chunk(nth_page(pages, i), chunk); > + pcpu_set_page_chunk(pages + i, chunk); > > chunk->data = pages; > chunk->base_addr = page_address(pages); > -- > 2.50.1 >
