On 8/28/25 17:18, Christophe ROULLIER wrote:
> On 8/22/25 16:34, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>> On STM32MP25 SoC, the syscfg peripheral provides a clock to the display
>> subsystem through a multiplexer.  Since it only provides a single clock,
>> the cell value is 0.
>>
>> Doing so allows the clock consumers to reach the peripheral and gate the
>> clock accordingly.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <r...@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Yannick Fertre <yannick.fer...@foss.st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-...@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32-syscon.yaml        | 31 
>> +++++++++++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32-syscon.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32-syscon.yaml
>> index
>> ed97652c84922813e94b1818c07fe8714891c089..95d2319afe235fa86974d80f89c9deeae2275232
>> 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32-syscon.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/stm32/st,stm32-syscon.yaml
>> @@ -36,20 +36,31 @@ properties:
>>     clocks:
>>       maxItems: 1
>>   +  "#clock-cells":
>> +    const: 0
>> +
>>   required:
>>     - compatible
>>     - reg
>>   -if:
>> -  properties:
>> -    compatible:
>> -      contains:
>> -        enum:
>> -          - st,stm32mp157-syscfg
>> -          - st,stm32f4-gcan
>> -then:
>> -  required:
>> -    - clocks
>> +allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - st,stm32mp157-syscfg
>> +              - st,stm32f4-gcan
>> +    then:
>> +      required:
>> +        - clocks
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          const: st,stm32mp25-syscfg
>> +    then:
>> +      required:
>> +        - "#clock-cells"
>>     additionalProperties: false
>>  
> Acked-by: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roull...@foss.st.com>
>
> You can merge it on DRM MISC.

Thanks Christophe ! :)

Best regards,
Raphaël
>
> Best Regards,
>   Christophe
>

Reply via email to