Hi Zihuan,

On 8/27/25 03:31, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
> annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
> counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 5d07ee85bdae..e3cb6d54f35b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -307,17 +307,16 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>                */
>               if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
>                   time_is_before_jiffies(last_update + 
> msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
> -                     struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +                     struct cpufreq_policy *policy 
> __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
Based on the guidance, in include/linux/cleanup.h, I would expect the
assignment to be done on this line.

"...the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
 * statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
 * function when __free() is used."
>                       int ref_cpu;
>  
> +                     policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>                       if (!policy)
>                               return -EINVAL;
>  
>                       if (!cpumask_intersects(policy->related_cpus,
> -                                             
> housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK))) {
> -                             cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +                                             
> housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK)))
>                               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -                     }
>  
>                       for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
>                               if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
> @@ -329,8 +328,6 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
>                                       break;
>                       }
>  
> -                     cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> -
>                       if (ref_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
>                               /* No alternative to pull info from */
>                               return -EAGAIN;

Thanks,

Ben

Reply via email to