On Wed Aug 20, 2025 at 3:21 AM CEST, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs > > between commit: > > db2e7bcee11c ("drm: nova-drm: fix 32-bit arm build") > > from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit: > > 94febfb5bcfb ("rust: drm: Drop the use of Opaque for ioctl arguments") > > from the drm tree. > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > particularly complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs > index 4fe62cf98a23,7e7d4e2de2fb..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs > @@@ -39,8 -36,7 +36,8 @@@ impl File > _ => return Err(EINVAL), > }; > > - getparam.value = value; > + #[allow(clippy::useless_conversion)] > - getparam.set_value(value.into()); > ++ getparam.value = value.into(); > > Ok(0) > }
I think this resolution doesn't compile, since attributes on expressions are behind an unstable feature flag. I assume your config does not have CONFIG_DRM_NOVA={y,m}. The resolution in [1] is the one I came up with in the drm-tip tree. I should probably have given you a head-up on this conflict, sorry for that. [1] diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs index 4fe62cf98a23,7e7d4e2de2fb..90b9d2d0ec4a --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nova/file.rs @@@ -39,8 -36,7 +36,7 @@@ impl File _ => return Err(EINVAL), }; - #[allow(clippy::useless_conversion)] - getparam.set_value(value.into()); - getparam.value = value; ++ getparam.value = Into::<u64>::into(value); Ok(0) }