On 8/19/25 15:58, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 03:17:46PM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>
>> On 8/19/25 13:01, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 11:15:54 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote:
>>>> The new STMicroelectronics SoC features a display controller similar to
>>>> the one used in previous SoCs. Because there is additional registers,
>>>> it is incompatible with existing IPs.
>>>>
>>>> Add the new name to the list of compatible string.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-...@foss.st.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-ltdc.yaml | 30
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> It seems several patches of this series triggered your bot without
>> warnings/errors messages.
>>
>> Did I missed something or is it just a glitch in the matrix ? :)
> 'make dt_binding_check' is broken in linux-next which is used if the
> base commit is not specified or not found. The latter was the case here.
> Should be fixed in tomorrow's linux-next.
Indeed, I am based on latest drm-misc-next, which explains the not found base
commit.
Thanks for this info
Raphaël
>
> Rob
