On Mon, 18. Aug 21:17, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > On 8/17/25 4:43 AM, Fedor Pchelkin wrote: > > For what the patch does there exists a drm_mode_remove() helper but it's > > static at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c and requires to be exported > > first. This probably looks like a subject for an independent for-next > > patch, if needed. > > So you're saying this change will take two iterations of patches to ping > pong the code? > > Why not just send this as a two patch series? > > 1) Export the symbol drm_mode_remove() > 2) This patch, but use the symbol. >
Initially I wasn't sure if the exporting patch was worth moving the code around and in the end decided to make the current patch with a minimum of prerequisites. But giving this a second glance, I see exporting the symbol would be technically better. I'll send out v2. Thanks!
