Hi Daniel,

Thank you very much for your review, for some reason it ended in my spam box, so I only saw it just now.

On 8/11/25 16:15, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 01:09:24PM +0200, Maud Spierings via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Maud Spierings <maudspieri...@gocontroll.com>

The Maxim MAX25014 is a 4-channel automotive grade backlight driver IC
with intgrated boost controller.

Signed-off-by: Maud Spierings maudspieri...@gocontroll.com
---
  MAINTAINERS                            |   2 +
  drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig        |   7 +
  drivers/video/backlight/Makefile       |   1 +
  drivers/video/backlight/max25014.c     | 449 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/platform_data/max25014.h |  24 ++

Who else included this header file? Can the code here simply be included
in the C file?

That was my instinct too, I was following a clearly incorrect pattern from another driver, merged the fields from that struct into the main max25014 struct.


diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/max25014.c 
b/drivers/video/backlight/max25014.c
new file mode 100644
index 
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..371b6017953ae5955f4dfef921980dfdedd65d85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/max25014.c
@@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Backlight driver for Maxim MAX25014
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2025 GOcontroll B.V.
+ * Author: Maud Spierings <maudspieri...@gocontroll.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/platform_data/max25014.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define MAX25014_ISET_DEFAULT_100 11U
+#define MAX_BRIGHTNESS (100U)
+#define MIN_BRIGHTNESS (0U)
+#define TON_MAX (130720U) /* @153Hz */
+#define TON_STEP (1307U) /* @153Hz */
+#define TON_MIN (0U)
+
+#define MAX25014_DEV_ID         (0x00U)
+#define MAX25014_REV_ID         (0x01U)
+#define MAX25014_ISET           (0x02U)
+#define MAX25014_IMODE          (0x03U)
+#define MAX25014_TON1H          (0x04U)
+#define MAX25014_TON1L          (0x05U)
+#define MAX25014_TON2H          (0x06U)
+#define MAX25014_TON2L          (0x07U)
+#define MAX25014_TON3H          (0x08U)
+#define MAX25014_TON3L          (0x09U)
+#define MAX25014_TON4H          (0x0AU)
+#define MAX25014_TON4L          (0x0BU)
+#define MAX25014_TON_1_4_LSB    (0x0CU)
+#define MAX25014_SETTING        (0x12U)
+#define MAX25014_DISABLE        (0x13U)
+#define MAX25014_BSTMON         (0x14U)
+#define MAX25014_IOUT1          (0x15U)
+#define MAX25014_IOUT2          (0x16U)
+#define MAX25014_IOUT3          (0x17U)
+#define MAX25014_IOUT4          (0x18U)
+#define MAX25014_OPEN           (0x1BU)
+#define MAX25014_SHORT_GND      (0x1CU)
+#define MAX25014_SHORT_LED      (0x1DU)
+#define MAX25014_MASK           (0x1EU)
+#define MAX25014_DIAG           (0x1FU)

Forcing all these constants to be unsigned is unusual. Is it really
needed?

Removed all the U's


+#define MAX25014_IMODE_HDIM     BIT(2)
+#define MAX25014_ISET_ENABLE    BIT(5)
+#define MAX25014_ISET_PSEN      BIT(4)
+#define MAX25014_DIAG_HW_RST    BIT(2)
+#define MAX25014_SETTING_FPWM   GENMASK(6, 4)
+
+struct max25014;

This is redundant. Remove.

Thats an interesting leftover, removed.

+
+struct max25014 {
+       const char *chipname;

Why keep this value around? It is only used during the probe.

+       struct i2c_client *client;
+       struct backlight_device *bl;
+       struct device *dev;

It is necessary to cache this, is it just a copy of client->dev)?

yep completely unnecessary, removed.


+       struct regmap *regmap;
+       struct max25014_platform_data *pdata;
+       struct gpio_desc *enable;
+       struct regulator *vin; /* regulator for boost converter Vin rail */
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config max25014_regmap_config = {
+       .reg_bits = 8,
+       .val_bits = 8,
+       .max_register = MAX25014_DIAG,
+};
+
+/**
+ * @brief get the bit mask for the DISABLE register.
+ *
+ * @param strings the led string configuration array.
+ * @return uint8_t bits to set in the register.
+ */
+static uint8_t strings_mask(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       uint8_t res, i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+               if (maxim->pdata->strings[i] == 0)
+                       res |= 1 << i;
+       }
+       return res;

Could this converison have happened during DT parsing?

inlined it, changed the strings field in to strings_mask and only store the mask it calculates.

+}
+
+/**
+ * @brief control the brightness with i2c registers
+ *
+ * @param regmap trivial
+ * @param brt brightness
+ * @return int
+ */
+static int max25014_register_control(struct regmap *regmap, uint32_t brt)
+{
+       uint32_t reg = TON_STEP * brt;
+       int ret;
+       /*
+        * 18 bit number lowest, 2 bits in first register,
+        * next lowest 8 in the L register, next 8 in the H register
+        * Seemingly setting the strength of only one string controls all of
+        * them, individual settings don't affect the outcome.
+        */
+
+       ret = regmap_write(regmap, MAX25014_TON_1_4_LSB, reg & 0b00000011);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       ret = regmap_write(regmap, MAX25014_TON1L, (reg >> 2) & 0b11111111);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       return regmap_write(regmap, MAX25014_TON1H, (reg >> 10) & 0b11111111);
+}
+
+static int max25014_check_errors(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       uint8_t i;
+       int ret;
+       uint32_t val;
+
+       ret = regmap_read(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_OPEN, &val);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       if (val > 0) {
+               dev_err(maxim->dev, "Open led strings detected on:\n");
+               for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+                       if (val & 1 << i)
+                               dev_err(maxim->dev, "string %d\n", i + 1);
+               }
+               return -EIO;
+       }
+
+       ret = regmap_read(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_SHORT_GND, &val);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       if (val > 0) {
+               dev_err(maxim->dev, "Short to ground detected on:\n");
+               for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+                       if (val & 1 << i)
+                               dev_err(maxim->dev, "string %d\n", i + 1);
+               }
+               return -EIO;
+       }
+
+       ret = regmap_read(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_SHORT_GND, &val);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       if (val > 0) {
+               dev_err(maxim->dev, "Shorted led detected on:\n");
+               for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+                       if (val & 1 << i)
+                               dev_err(maxim->dev, "string %d\n", i + 1);
+               }
+               return -EIO;
+       }
+
+       ret = regmap_read(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_DIAG, &val);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+       /*
+        * The HW_RST bit always starts at 1 after power up.
+        * It is reset on first read, does not indicate an error.
+        */
+       if (val > 0 && val != MAX25014_DIAG_HW_RST) {
+               if (val & 0b1)
+                       dev_err(maxim->dev, "Overtemperature shutdown\n");
+               if (val & 0b10)
+                       dev_warn(maxim->dev,
+                                "Chip is getting too hot (>125C)\n");
+               if (val & 0b1000)
+                       dev_err(maxim->dev, "Boost converter overvoltage\n");
+               if (val & 0b10000)
+                       dev_err(maxim->dev, "Boost converter undervoltage\n");
+               if (val & 0b100000)
+                       dev_err(maxim->dev, "IREF out of range\n");
+               return -EIO;
+       }
+       return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * 1. disable unused strings
+ * 2. set dim mode
+ * 3. set initial brightness
+ * 4. set setting register
+ * 5. enable the backlight
+ */
+static int max25014_configure(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       int ret;
+       uint32_t val;
+
+       ret = regmap_write(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_DISABLE,
+                          strings_mask(maxim));
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = regmap_write(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_IMODE, MAX25014_IMODE_HDIM);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       max25014_register_control(maxim->regmap,
+                                 maxim->pdata->initial_brightness);
+
+       ret = regmap_read(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_SETTING, &val);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = regmap_write(
+               maxim->regmap, MAX25014_SETTING,
+               val & ~MAX25014_SETTING_FPWM);
+       if (ret != 0)
+               return ret;
+
+       ret = regmap_write(maxim->regmap, MAX25014_ISET,
+                          maxim->pdata->iset | MAX25014_ISET_ENABLE | 
MAX25014_ISET_PSEN);
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int max25014_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl_dev)
+{
+       struct max25014 *maxim = bl_get_data(bl_dev);
+
+       if (bl_dev->props.state & BL_CORE_SUSPENDED)
+               bl_dev->props.brightness = 0;
+
+       return max25014_register_control(maxim->regmap, 
bl_dev->props.brightness);
+}
+
+static const struct backlight_ops max25014_bl_ops = {
+       .options = BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME,
+       .update_status = max25014_update_status,
+};
+
+static int max25014_backlight_register(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       struct backlight_device *bl;
+       struct backlight_properties props;
+       struct max25014_platform_data *pdata = maxim->pdata;
+
+       memset(&props, 0, sizeof(props));
+       props.type = BACKLIGHT_PLATFORM;
+       props.max_brightness = MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
+
+       if (pdata->initial_brightness > props.max_brightness)
+               pdata->initial_brightness = props.max_brightness;

Handle this during DT parsing.

It is already handled there, this is double, so dropped.

+
+       props.brightness = pdata->initial_brightness;
+
+       bl = devm_backlight_device_register(maxim->dev, maxim->chipname, 
maxim->dev,
+                                           maxim, &max25014_bl_ops, &props);
+       if (IS_ERR(bl))
+               return PTR_ERR(bl);
+
+       maxim->bl = bl;
+
+       return 0;
+}

Can max25014_backlight_register() be moved into the probe function?
There is no special control flow here so this function doesn't make the
probe function any simpler.

Done.

+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int max25014_parse_dt(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       struct device *dev = maxim->dev;
+       struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
+       struct max25014_platform_data *pdata;
+
+       int res;
+
+       if (!node) {
+               dev_err(dev, "no platform data\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!pdata)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       res = of_property_count_u32_elems(node, "maxim,strings");
+       if (res == 4) {
+               of_property_read_u32_array(node, "maxim,strings", 
pdata->strings, 4);
+       } else {
+               dev_err(dev, "strings property not correctly defined\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       pdata->initial_brightness = 50U;
+       of_property_read_u32(node, "default-brightness", 
&pdata->initial_brightness);
+       pdata->iset = MAX25014_ISET_DEFAULT_100;
+       of_property_read_u32(node, "maxim,iset", &pdata->iset);
+
+       if (pdata->iset < 0 || pdata->iset > 15) {
+               dev_err(dev,
+                       "Invalid iset, should be a value from 0-15, entered was 
%d\n",
+                       pdata->iset);
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       if (pdata->initial_brightness < 0 || pdata->initial_brightness > 100) {
+               dev_err(dev,
+                       "Invalid initial brightness, should be a value from 0-100, 
entered was %d\n",
+                       pdata->initial_brightness);
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       maxim->pdata = pdata;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int max25014_parse_dt(struct max25014 *maxim)
+{
+       dev_err(maxim->dev,
+               "CONFIG_OF not configured, unable to parse devicetree");
+       return -EINVAL;
+}

What is the point of this method? New drivers shouldn't support platform
data so CONFIG_OF is required for this driver to work at all.

I think it is me following a bad pattern again, dropped the ifdef.

+#endif
+
+static int max25014_probe(struct i2c_client *cl)
...

Kind regards,
Maud

Reply via email to