On 7/16/2025 6:58 PM, Ling Xu wrote:
> Currently the domain ids are added for each instance of domains, this is
> totally not scalable approach. Clean this mess and create domain ids for
> only domains not its instances.
>
> Co-developed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ling Xu <quic_l...@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> index 495ac47e7f90..85b6eb16b616 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>  #define MDSP_DOMAIN_ID (1)
>  #define SDSP_DOMAIN_ID (2)
>  #define CDSP_DOMAIN_ID (3)
> -#define CDSP1_DOMAIN_ID (4)
> -#define FASTRPC_DEV_MAX              5 /* adsp, mdsp, slpi, cdsp, cdsp1 */
>  #define FASTRPC_MAX_SESSIONS 14
>  #define FASTRPC_MAX_VMIDS    16
>  #define FASTRPC_ALIGN                128
> @@ -106,8 +104,6 @@
>  
>  #define miscdev_to_fdevice(d) container_of(d, struct fastrpc_device, miscdev)
>  
> -static const char *domains[FASTRPC_DEV_MAX] = { "adsp", "mdsp",
> -                                             "sdsp", "cdsp", "cdsp1" };
>  struct fastrpc_phy_page {
>       u64 addr;               /* physical address */
>       u64 size;               /* size of contiguous region */
> @@ -2243,6 +2239,20 @@ static int fastrpc_device_register(struct device *dev, 
> struct fastrpc_channel_ct
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int fastrpc_get_domain_id(const char *domain)
> +{
> +     if (!strncmp(domain, "adsp", 4))
> +             return ADSP_DOMAIN_ID;
> +     else if (!strncmp(domain, "cdsp", 4))
> +             return CDSP_DOMAIN_ID;
> +     else if (!strncmp(domain, "mdsp", 4))
> +             return MDSP_DOMAIN_ID;
> +     else if (!strncmp(domain, "sdsp", 4))
> +             return SDSP_DOMAIN_ID;
> +
> +     return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>  {
>       struct device *rdev = &rpdev->dev;
> @@ -2260,15 +2270,10 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device 
> *rpdev)
>               return err;
>       }
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < FASTRPC_DEV_MAX; i++) {
> -             if (!strcmp(domains[i], domain)) {
> -                     domain_id = i;
> -                     break;
> -             }
> -     }
> +     domain_id = fastrpc_get_domain_id(domain);
>  
>       if (domain_id < 0) {
> -             dev_info(rdev, "FastRPC Invalid Domain ID %d\n", domain_id);
> +             dev_info(rdev, "FastRPC Domain %s not supported\n", domain);
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> @@ -2318,21 +2323,20 @@ static int fastrpc_rpmsg_probe(struct rpmsg_device 
> *rpdev)
>       case ADSP_DOMAIN_ID:
>       case MDSP_DOMAIN_ID:
>       case SDSP_DOMAIN_ID:
> -             /* Unsigned PD offloading is only supported on CDSP and CDSP1 */
> +             /* Unsigned PD offloading is only supported on CDSP */
>               data->unsigned_support = false;
> -             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, secure_dsp, 
> domains[domain_id]);
> +             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, secure_dsp, domain);
>               if (err)
>                       goto err_free_data;
>               break;
>       case CDSP_DOMAIN_ID:
> -     case CDSP1_DOMAIN_ID:
>               data->unsigned_support = true;
>               /* Create both device nodes so that we can allow both Signed 
> and Unsigned PD */
> -             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, true, 
> domains[domain_id]);
> +             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, true, domain);
>               if (err)
>                       goto err_free_data;
>  
> -             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, false, 
> domains[domain_id]);
> +             err = fastrpc_device_register(rdev, data, false, domain);
>               if (err)
>                       goto err_deregister_fdev;
>               break;

Reviewed-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gu...@oss.qualcomm.com>


Reply via email to