Currently, KUnit parameterized tests lack a mechanism
to share resources across individual test invocations
because the same `struct kunit` instance is reused for
each test.

This patch refactors kunit_run_tests() to provide each
parameterized test with its own `struct kunit` instance.
A new parent pointer is added to `struct kunit`, allowing
individual parameterized tests to reference a shared
parent kunit instance. Resources added to this parent
will then be accessible to all individual parameter
test executions.

Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marie...@google.com>
---
 include/kunit/test.h | 12 ++++++++++--
 lib/kunit/test.c     | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 39c768f87dc9..a42d0c8cb985 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -268,14 +268,22 @@ struct kunit_suite_set {
  *
  * @priv: for user to store arbitrary data. Commonly used to pass data
  *       created in the init function (see &struct kunit_suite).
+ * @parent: for user to store data that they want to shared across
+ *         parameterized tests.
  *
  * Used to store information about the current context under which the test
  * is running. Most of this data is private and should only be accessed
- * indirectly via public functions; the one exception is @priv which can be
- * used by the test writer to store arbitrary data.
+ * indirectly via public functions; the two exceptions are @priv and @parent
+ * which can be used by the test writer to store arbitrary data or data that is
+ * available to all parameter test executions, respectively.
  */
 struct kunit {
        void *priv;
+       /*
+        * Reference to the parent struct kunit for storing shared resources
+        * during parameterized testing.
+        */
+       struct kunit *parent;
 
        /* private: internal use only. */
        const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index f3c6b11f12b8..4d6a39eb2c80 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
        struct kunit_case *test_case;
        struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 };
        struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 };
+       const void *curr_param;
 
        /* Taint the kernel so we know we've run tests. */
        add_taint(TAINT_TEST, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
@@ -679,36 +680,39 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
                } else {
                        /* Get initial param. */
                        param_desc[0] = '\0';
-                       test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, 
param_desc);
+                       /* TODO: Make generate_params try-catch */
+                       curr_param = test_case->generate_params(NULL, 
param_desc);
                        test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED;
                        kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT 
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
                                  "KTAP version 1\n");
                        kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT 
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
                                  "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
 
-                       while (test.param_value) {
-                               kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, 
&test);
+                       while (curr_param) {
+                               struct kunit param_test = {
+                                       .param_value = curr_param,
+                                       .param_index = ++test.param_index,
+                                       .parent = &test,
+                               };
+                               kunit_init_test(&param_test, test_case->name, 
test_case->log);
+                               kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, 
&param_test);
 
                                if (param_desc[0] == '\0') {
                                        snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc),
                                                 "param-%d", test.param_index);
                                }
 
-                               kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, 
KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE_PARAM,
-                                                     test.status,
-                                                     test.param_index + 1,
+                               kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&param_test, 
KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE_PARAM,
+                                                     param_test.status,
+                                                     param_test.param_index,
                                                      param_desc,
-                                                     test.status_comment);
+                                                     
param_test.status_comment);
 
-                               kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+                               kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, 
param_test.status);
 
                                /* Get next param. */
                                param_desc[0] = '\0';
-                               test.param_value = 
test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
-                               test.param_index++;
-                               test.status = KUNIT_SUCCESS;
-                               test.status_comment[0] = '\0';
-                               test.priv = NULL;
+                               curr_param = 
test_case->generate_params(curr_param, param_desc);
                        }
                }
 
@@ -723,6 +727,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 
                kunit_update_stats(&suite_stats, test_case->status);
                kunit_accumulate_stats(&total_stats, param_stats);
+               /* TODO: Put this kunit_cleanup into a try-catch. */
+               kunit_cleanup(&test);
        }
 
        if (suite->suite_exit)
-- 
2.50.1.552.g942d659e1b-goog

Reply via email to