On 7/13/25 8:11 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
On Sun Jul 13, 2025 at 11:51 AM JST, Rhys Lloyd wrote:
Introduce an associated constant `MIN_LEN` for each struct that checks
the length of the input data in its constructor against a magic number.

Signed-off-by: Rhys Lloyd <krako...@gmail.com>
As I mentioned in [1], I think this would be better addressed by working
in terms of `sizeof` upon the relevant structures, after making them
`#[repr(C)]`. It might require splitting them a bit since some contain
other data (or we can maybe turn them into DSTs).

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/db97x8jajfi4.3g1i8zpc1m...@nvidia.com/

As far as I can tell, only one of the five structs with `MIN_LEN` have the same layout in-memory as they do in the `data` byte slice, that being `BitHeader`.  Perhaps `#[repr(packed)]` could be used for `PmuLookupTableEntry`, sacrificing alignment, but that is undesirable as it comes with its own footguns such as unaligned loads.  The other structs include optional values and vectors which do not have the same encoding when reading from the `data` byte slice as they do in memory.  I have worked with DSTs before, but I don't recommend them for non-library code since they are not first-class citizens in Rust.  Notably the fat pointer is not resized when taking a reference to the unsized struct field, and constructing such objects is cumbersome.  Also, in the current version of Rust (1.88), DSTs cannot yet live comfortably on the stack.

This patch can be dropped if it's not valuable enough to warrant the change, I only made it because of your comment here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nova/-/merge_requests/4#note_2999761

Reply via email to