On 08.07.25 14:03, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttu...@nvidia.com> > > dma_fence_get_status is not guaranteed to return valid information > on if the fence has been signaled or not if SW signaling has not > been enabled for the fence. To ensure valid information is reported, > enable SW signaling for fences before getting their status.
I don't know how often I had to rejected that patch now, we really need to improve the documentation :( The fence info query exists to query the status *without* enabling signaling, that is the whole purpose of the function! If you want to enable signaling *and* query the status then just poll on the sync file file descriptor with a zero timeout. If the signaling timestamp or error code is needed then that can be retrieved after signaling through the info IOCTL. Regards, Christian. > > Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttu...@nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c > index > 747e377fb95417ddd506b528618a4288bea9d459..a6fd1d14dde155561b9fd2c07e6aa20dc9863a8d > 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c > +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c > @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ static int sync_fill_fence_info(struct dma_fence *fence, > const char __rcu *timeline; > const char __rcu *driver; > > + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence); > + > rcu_read_lock(); > > driver = dma_fence_driver_name(fence); > @@ -320,6 +322,7 @@ static long sync_file_ioctl_fence_info(struct sync_file > *sync_file, > * info->num_fences. > */ > if (!info.num_fences) { > + dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(sync_file->fence); > info.status = dma_fence_get_status(sync_file->fence); > goto no_fences; > } else { > > --- > base-commit: 58ba80c4740212c29a1cf9b48f588e60a7612209 > change-id: 20250708-syncfile-enable-signaling-a993acff1860 >