Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynow...@linux.intel.com>
On 7/4/2025 9:53 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> The cover letter of the set can be found here
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>.
>
> In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> rc2:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
> pm-runtime-6.17-rc1
>
> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c | 1 -
> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
> index 060f1fc031d3..05a1a768e1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
> @@ -1049,6 +1049,5 @@ void ivpu_context_abort_work_fn(struct work_struct
> *work)
> mutex_unlock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock);
>
> runtime_put:
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(vdev->drm.dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(vdev->drm.dev);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
> index eacda1dbe840..761b4d7e1a5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ int ivpu_rpm_get(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
>
> void ivpu_rpm_put(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
> {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(vdev->drm.dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(vdev->drm.dev);
> }
>
> @@ -428,7 +427,6 @@ void ivpu_pm_enable(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
> struct device *dev = vdev->drm.dev;
>
> pm_runtime_allow(dev);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> }
>
