On 24/06/25 4:12 pm, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 02:54:14PM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Drop the drm_panel field of the mchp_lvds struct as it is unused.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dharma Balasubiramani <dharm...@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c | 7 -------
>> 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> index 9f4ff82bc6b4..42751124b868 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/microchip-lvds.c
>> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_bridge.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_of.h>
>> -#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_print.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_simple_kms_helper.h>
>> @@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ struct mchp_lvds {
>> struct device *dev;
>> void __iomem *regs;
>> struct clk *pclk;
>> - struct drm_panel *panel;
>> struct drm_bridge bridge;
>> struct drm_bridge *panel_bridge;
>> };
>> @@ -179,13 +177,8 @@ static int mchp_lvds_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> "can't find port point, please init lvds panel
>> port!\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>
> The above code seems unneeded now, I think you can drop it too.
Yes, I considered removing it as well. However, I was wondering if it
might still be valuable to return early when the endpoint isn't found,
to clearly indicate that the panel port is missing.
>
>> -
>> - lvds->panel = of_drm_find_panel(port);
>> of_node_put(port);
>>
>> - if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel))
>> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> -
>> lvds->panel_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(dev, dev->of_node, 1, 0);
>>
>> if (IS_ERR(lvds->panel_bridge))
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
--
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.
