On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:15 PM,  <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
>
> Nouveau makes the assumption that if a TTM is bound there will be a mm_node
> around for it and the backwards ordering here resulted in a use-after-free
> on some eviction paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
> ---
> ?drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | ? ?2 +-
> ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> index 77dbf40..ae3c6f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> @@ -635,13 +635,13 @@ int ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup(struct ttm_buffer_object 
> *bo,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (ret)
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return ret;
>
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ttm_bo_free_old_node(bo);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if ((man->flags & TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED) &&
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(bo->ttm != NULL)) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ttm_tt_unbind(bo->ttm);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?bo->ttm = NULL;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?}
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ttm_bo_free_old_node(bo);
> ? ? ? ?} else {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?/**
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? * This should help pipeline ordinary buffer moves.
> --
> 1.7.6
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>

Reply via email to