On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 07:10:11AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 1:17 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.barysh...@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 07:45:01PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> > > X1P42100 SoC has a new GPU called Adreno X1-45 which is a smaller
> > > version of Adreno X1-85 GPU. Describe this new GPU and also add
> > > the secure gpu firmware path that should used for X1P42100 CRD.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhi...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 7 ++
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100-crd.dts | 4 +
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100.dtsi | 121
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> > > index
> > > a8eb4c5fe99fe6dd49af200a738b6476d87279b2..558d7d387d7710770244fcc901f461384dd9b0d4
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi
> > > @@ -8245,6 +8245,13 @@ sbsa_watchdog: watchdog@1c840000 {
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > + qfprom: efuse@221c8000 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
> > > + reg = <0 0x221c8000 0 0x1000>;
> > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > pmu@24091000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-llcc-bwmon",
> > > "qcom,sc7280-llcc-bwmon";
> > > reg = <0 0x24091000 0 0x1000>;
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100-crd.dts
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100-crd.dts
> > > index
> > > cf07860a63e97c388909fb5721ae7b9729b6c586..cf999c2cf8d4e0af83078253fd39ece3a0c26a49
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100-crd.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100-crd.dts
> > > @@ -15,3 +15,7 @@ / {
> > > model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. X1P42100 CRD";
> > > compatible = "qcom,x1p42100-crd", "qcom,x1p42100";
> > > };
> > > +
> > > +&gpu_zap_shader {
> > > + firmware-name = "qcom/x1p42100/gen71500_zap.mbn";
> > > +};
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100.dtsi
> > > index
> > > 27f479010bc330eb6445269a1c46bf78ec6f1bd4..5ed461ed5cca271d43647888aa6eacac3de2ac9d
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1p42100.dtsi
> > > @@ -17,15 +17,134 @@
> > > /delete-node/ &cpu_pd9;
> > > /delete-node/ &cpu_pd10;
> > > /delete-node/ &cpu_pd11;
> > > +/delete-node/ &gpu_opp_table;
> > > /delete-node/ &pcie3_phy;
> > >
> > > &gcc {
> > > compatible = "qcom,x1p42100-gcc", "qcom,x1e80100-gcc";
> > > };
> > >
> > > -/* The GPU is physically different and will be brought up later */
> > > +&gmu {
> > > + /delete-property/ compatible;
> > > + compatible = "qcom,adreno-gmu-x145.0", "qcom,adreno-gmu";
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +&qfprom {
> > > + gpu_speed_bin: gpu_speed_bin@119 {
> > > + reg = <0x119 0x2>;
> > > + bits = <7 9>;
> > > + };
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > &gpu {
> > > /delete-property/ compatible;
> >
> > I think, you can drop this line.
> >
> > > +
> > > + compatible = "qcom,adreno-43030c00", "qcom,adreno";
> > > +
> > > + nvmem-cells = <&gpu_speed_bin>;
> > > + nvmem-cell-names = "speed_bin";
> > > +
> > > + gpu_opp_table: opp-table {
> > > + compatible = "operating-points-v2-adreno",
> > > "operating-points-v2";
> > > +
> > > + opp-1400000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1400000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L4>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <16500000>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0xa8295ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0x3>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-1250000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1250000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L3>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <16500000>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0x882a5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0x7>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-1107000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1107000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L1>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <16500000>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0x882a5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-1014000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1014000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <14398438>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0xa82a5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-940000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <940000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM_L1>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <14398438>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0xa82a5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-825000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <825000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <12449219>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0x882b5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-720000000 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <720000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L2>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <10687500>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0xa82c5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + opp-666000000-0 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <666000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L1>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <8171875>;
> > > + qcom,opp-acd-level = <0xa82d5ffd>;
> > > + opp-supported-hw = <0xf>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + /* Only applicable for SKUs which has 666Mhz as Fmax */
> > > + opp-666000000-1 {
> > > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <666000000>;
> > > + opp-level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L1>;
> > > + opp-peak-kBps = <16500000>;
> >
> > This looks odd, why is it so high?
>
> You want max bandwidth on max opp
Yes, but can it actually sustain / provide this BW?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
