On 05.06.25 14:09, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 07:35:24PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:

If all dax pages are special, then vm_normal_page() should never find
them and gup should fail.

...oh, but vm_normal_page_p[mu]d() is not used in the gup path, and
'special' is not set in the pte path.

That seems really suboptimal?? Why would pmd and pte be different?

I think for any p[mu]d where p[mu]d_page() is ok to use should never set
'special', right?

There should be dedicated functions for installing pages and PFNs,
only the PFN one would set the special bit.

And certainly your tests *should* be failing as special entries should
never ever be converted to struct page.

Worth reviewing [1] where I clean that up and describe the current impact. ;)

What's even worse about this pte_devmap()/pmd_devmap()/... shit (sorry! but it's absolute shit) is that some pte_mkdev() set the pte special, while others ... don't.

E.g., loongarch

static inline pte_t pte_mkdevmap(pte_t pte) { pte_val(pte) |= _PAGE_DEVMAP; return pte; }

I don't even know how it can (could) survive vm_normal_page().


Of course, a wild (and different) mixture on pmd_mkdevmap() as well.

So happy to see that go away.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250603211634.2925015-1-da...@redhat.com

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to