On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > This could also be fixed by simply increasing BL_NAME_SIZE to 24, making it > large enough to fit any size integer into its format string, or by checking > the return value of snprintf.
I think this would be a better approach. backlist_name[24] is still small enough to fit on the stack with ease, and it would eliminate the alloc/free churn. kasprintf() should be reserved for long-term or larger allocations, IMHO.
