On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:27:33AM +0200, Benno Lossin wrote: > That's also fair, but we lose the constness of `next_multiple_of`, so > you can't use `align_up` in a const function. That might confuse people > and then they write their own const helper function... I'd prefer we use > all functions that are available in the stdlib.
Considering that, what's the suggestion for this trait? I don't think we should have a trait with align_down() and fls() only and otherwise use next_multiple_of(), i.e. mix things up. I think we should either align with the Rust nomenclature - whatever this means for fls() - or implement the trait with all three methods.
