On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 19:14, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@tomeuvizoso.net> wrote:
>
> This series adds a new driver for the NPU that Rockchip includes in its
> newer SoCs, developed by them on the NVDLA base.
>
> In its current form, it supports the specific NPU in the RK3588 SoC.
>
> The userspace driver is part of Mesa and an initial draft can be found at:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29698
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <to...@tomeuvizoso.net>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Several fixes to DT bindings.
> - Link to v3: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250516-6-10-rocket-v3-0-7051ac922...@tomeuvizoso.net
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Reference in the device tree only the register blocks that are
>   actually used.
> - Several style and robustness fixes suggested in the mailing list.
> - Added patches from Nicolas Frattaroli that add support to the NPU for
>   the Rock 5B board.
> - Link to v2: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225-6-10-rocket-v2-0-d4dbcfafc...@tomeuvizoso.net
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop patch adding the rk3588 compatible to rockchip-iommu (Sebastian 
> Reichel)
> - Drop patch adding support for multiple power domains to rockchip-iommu 
> (Sebastian Reichel)
> - Link to v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240612-6-10-rocket-v1-0-060e48eea...@tomeuvizoso.net
>
> ---
> Nicolas Frattaroli (2):
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: add pd_npu label for RK3588 power domains
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: enable NPU on ROCK 5B
>
> Tomeu Vizoso (8):
>       dt-bindings: npu: rockchip,rknn: Add bindings
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Add nodes for NPU and its MMU to rk3588s
>       arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable the NPU on quartzpro64
>       accel/rocket: Add registers header
>       accel/rocket: Add a new driver for Rockchip's NPU
>       accel/rocket: Add IOCTL for BO creation
>       accel/rocket: Add job submission IOCTL
>       accel/rocket: Add IOCTLs for synchronizing memory accesses

Can this be possible to infer yolov8/10? Do we need to convert PT/ONNX
to any other common format's unlike rknn?

Thanks,
Jagan.

Reply via email to