Hi Jayesh, On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 05:48:56PM +0530, Jayesh Choudhary wrote: > As per the bindings, I see that we should have "no-hpd" property in > the device description for platforms with bad HPD or disconnected HPD. > > Then we can read it in ti_sn65dsi86_probe() before resume call and use > it as a conditional instead. > Since I do not have any "bad HPD signal" board, I would need some > help validating this on such boards from Ernest.
This sounds like a good approach to me, during my investigation I also thought the "no-hpd" property should enter into the story. I will gladly help with testing and will add a jumper to my board so I can turn it into a bad/good HPD signal board. Thanks for the efforts and kind regards, Ernest
