On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:56:03PM GMT, Chaoyi Chen wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 2025/5/19 14:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 19/05/2025 03:26, Chaoyi Chen wrote: > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Andy Yan <andy....@rock-chip.com> > > > + - Heiko Stuebner <he...@sntech.de> > > > + - Sandy Huang <h...@rock-chips.com> > > > + > > > +allOf: > > > + - $ref: /schemas/sound/dai-common.yaml# > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + items: > > > + - const: rockchip,rk3399-cdn-dp > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + clocks: > > > + items: > > > + - description: DP core work clock > > > + - description: APB clock > > > + - description: SPDIF interface clock > > > + - description: GRF clock > > > + > > > + clock-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: core-clk > > > + - const: pclk > > > + - const: spdif > > > + - const: grf > > > + > > > + extcon: > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array > > > + items: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > Instead of this, list the items. Old binding said only "specifier", so > > this is technically a change, which should be explained in commit msg. > > Will fix in v5. > > > > > > > + description: > > > + List of phandle to the extcon device providing the cable state for > > > the DP PHY. > > > + > > > + interrupts: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + phys: > > > + items: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + maxItems: 2 > > > + description: | > > > + List of phandle to the PHY device for DP output. > > > + RK3399 have two DP-TPYEC PHY, specifying one PHY which want to use, > > > + or specify two PHYs here to let the driver determine which PHY to > > > use. > > > > You do not allow one phy, so your description is not accurate. OTOH, > > original binding did not allow two phandles, so that's another change in > > the binding. You need to document all changes done to the binding in the > > commit msg. > > Oh, the original binding example use two phandles. I think only one PHY can
Example is not the binding, just an example. > also pass the dtb check here, or maybe I'm missing something else? You think or you tested it? What is the minItems value? 2, so even if this works it's rather a bug in dtschema. Also, inner maxItems:1 is not really correct. Why can't this work with different phy providers? Best regards, Krzysztof
