Hello Alexander, On 06/05/2025 at 11:07:21 GMT, "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usys...@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> On 26/03/2025 at 17:26:12 +02, Alexander Usyskin >> <alexander.usys...@intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Create master device without partition when >> > CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONED_MASTER flag is unset. >> > >> > This streamlines device tree and allows to anchor >> > runtime power management on master device in all cases. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usys...@intel.com> >> >> Applied to mtd/next. Thanks! >> >> Miquèl > > Thanks a lot! > > Miquel, would you pick patches from this series for files that are > in the mtd tree? > I can send separate patch series for this. > In this case the i915/Xe patches can be merged in parallel via Xe > tree. I read several times that these patches should go through drm somehow, so I provided my Ack. I do not think build would be broken if patch 1 goes through mtd and the others through drm anyway, especially since drm has some structural slowness which means once applied to drm-misc(-next) they may be part of the main tree a release later (iiuc). However, I might drop this patch and reapply the one from v9, because I apparently messed up with the version count. There is no action required on your side. Thanks, Miquèl
