On 5/9/25 17:47, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 04:33:40PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> Replace open-coded helper with the subsystem one.
>>
>
> You probably can just send this one by itself as it good cleanup and
> independent.
>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Any objections that I start to push those patches to drm-misc-next or do you
want to take this one through the i915 branch?
Regards,
Christian.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@igalia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 7 +------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
>> index 7127e90c1a8f..991666fd9f85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c
>> @@ -106,11 +106,6 @@ static void fence_set_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> }
>>
>> -static inline bool __dma_fence_is_chain(const struct dma_fence *fence)
>> -{
>> - return fence->ops == &dma_fence_chain_ops;
>> -}
>> -
>> void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence *fence,
>> const struct i915_sched_attr *attr)
>> {
>> @@ -126,7 +121,7 @@ void i915_gem_fence_wait_priority(struct dma_fence
>> *fence,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < array->num_fences; i++)
>> fence_set_priority(array->fences[i], attr);
>> - } else if (__dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
>> + } else if (dma_fence_is_chain(fence)) {
>> struct dma_fence *iter;
>>
>> /* The chain is ordered; if we boost the last, we boost all */
>> --
>> 2.48.0
>>
