вт, 6 трав. 2025 р. о 20:49 Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> пише:
>
> Le 06/05/2025 à 11:33, Svyatoslav Ryhel a écrit :
> > SSD2825 is a cost-effective MIPI Bridge Chip solution targeting mainly
> > smartphones. It can convert 24bit RGB interface into 4-lane MIPI-DSI
> > interface to drive display modules of up to 800 x 1366, while supporting
> > AMOLED, a-si LCD or LTPS panel technologies for smartphone applications.
>
> Hi,
>
> ...
>
> > +config DRM_SOLOMON_SSD2825
> > +     tristate "SSD2825 RGB/DSI bridge"
> > +     depends on SPI_MASTER && OF
> > +     select DRM_MIPI_DSI
> > +     select DRM_KMS_HELPER
> > +     select DRM_PANEL
> > +     help
> > +       Say Y here if you want support for the Solomon SSD2825 RGB/DSI
> > +       SPI bridge driver.
> > +
> > +       Say M here if you want to support this hardware as a module.
> > +       The module will be named "solomon-ssd2825".
>
> Is it "solomon-ssd2825" or just "ssd2825"?
>
> > +
> >   config DRM_THINE_THC63LVD1024
> >       tristate "Thine THC63LVD1024 LVDS decoder bridge"
> >       depends on OF
>
> ...
>
> > +static int ssd2825_read_raw(struct ssd2825_priv *priv, u8 cmd, u16 *data)
> > +{
> > +     struct spi_device *spi = priv->spi;
> > +     struct spi_message msg;
> > +     struct spi_transfer xfer[2];
> > +     u8 tx_buf[2];
> > +     u8 rx_buf[2];
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     memset(&xfer, 0, sizeof(xfer));
> > +
> > +     tx_buf[1] = (cmd & 0xFF00) >> 8;
> > +     tx_buf[0] = (cmd & 0x00FF);
> > +
> > +     xfer[0].tx_buf = tx_buf;
> > +     xfer[0].bits_per_word = 9;
> > +     xfer[0].len = 2;
> > +
> > +     xfer[1].rx_buf = rx_buf;
> > +     xfer[1].bits_per_word = 16;
> > +     xfer[1].len = 2;
> > +
> > +     spi_message_init(&msg);
> > +     spi_message_add_tail(&xfer[0], &msg);
> > +     spi_message_add_tail(&xfer[1], &msg);
> > +
> > +     ret = spi_sync(spi, &msg);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             dev_err(&spi->dev, "spi_sync_read failed %d\n", ret);
>
> Maybe, just spi_sync in the message?
>
> > +
> > +     *data = rx_buf[1] | (rx_buf[0] << 8);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
>
> Is it on purpose that ret is never returned?
> Is it safe to update *data if ret is not 0?
>
> > +}
>

Acknowledged, thank you

> ...
>
> CJ

Reply via email to