Am Mittwoch, dem 07.05.2025 um 13:21 +0200 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
> We should be comparing the last submitted sequence number with that of
> the address space we may be switching to.
> 
> And we should be using the latter as the last submitted sequence number
> afterwards.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <to...@tomeuvizoso.net>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_buffer.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_buffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_buffer.c
> index b13a17276d07..865b07b14b38 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_buffer.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ void etnaviv_buffer_queue(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu, u32 
> exec_state,
>       u32 link_target, link_dwords;
>       bool switch_context = gpu->exec_state != exec_state;
>       bool switch_mmu_context = gpu->mmu_context != mmu_context;
> -     unsigned int new_flush_seq = READ_ONCE(gpu->mmu_context->flush_seq);
> +     unsigned int new_flush_seq = READ_ONCE(mmu_context->flush_seq);
>       bool need_flush = switch_mmu_context || gpu->flush_seq != new_flush_seq;
>       bool has_blt = !!(gpu->identity.minor_features5 &
>                         chipMinorFeatures5_BLT_ENGINE);
> @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ void etnaviv_buffer_queue(struct etnaviv_gpu *gpu, u32 
> exec_state,
>                       struct etnaviv_iommu_context *old_context = 
> gpu->mmu_context;
>  
>                       gpu->mmu_context = 
> etnaviv_iommu_context_get(mmu_context);
> +                     gpu->flush_seq = new_flush_seq;

As I said in IRC: this should not be necessary. If we switch to a new
MMU context, need_flush will also be set. The code under the need_flush
condition already includes this exact line.

Regards,
Lucas

Reply via email to