On Wed, Mar 19 2025 at 10:28, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the
> respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that
> the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts
> during merges.
So. It's rc5 by now and I picked up everything which did not show up in
next yet. As there are some patches in next, I delayed the removal of
functions for the merge window so that we don't end up with merge
dependencies.
To reducde conflicts, I grabbed the irq branch from the PCI tree under
the assumption that this branch is stable.
The series sits now in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/cleanups
and will be in next soon. If there are duplicates showing up in next,
I'm going to remove them from my branch, so the branch is not for basing
development on.
@Jiri, I fixed up all your subject prefixes as
'irqdomain: subsys: Switch to foo()'
does not make any sense at all. These subsystems have their regular
prefixes and these changes do not justify made up irqdomain special
prefixes at all.
Thanks,
tglx
