Hi Dmitry, On Mon, 5 May 2025 14:58:58 +0300 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> On 05/05/2025 14:06, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > Inki, Kyungmin, Seung-Woo, Alim, > > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:08:14 +0200 > > Maxime Ripard <mrip...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> Inki, Kyungmin, Seung-Woo, sorry for the mishap. Do you agree with the > >> following patch, and it going through drm-misc? > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250424-drm-bridge-convert-to-alloc-api-v2-14-8f91a404d...@bootlin.com/ > >> > >> If not, we'll revert. > > > > Did you have a chance to have a look at the patch mentioned by Maxime? > > > > It was applied to drm-misc-next by mistake. Not your mistake of course, > > but now it's there so if you don't reply anything it will have to be > > reverted, and then sent again to go through all the review process to > > be hopefully re-applied in the future. > > > > If you agree with keeping it in drm-misc-next, that would be less noise > > for everybody. > > > > I'm going to send v3 very soon, so it would be good to decide what to > > do before that. > > For the record: even though I'm not happy with msm-related patches going > through drm-misc without additional ack from our side, I think reverting > those and reapplying them later will create a bigger mess. So, I'm fine > with keeping drm/msm/* bridged patches in. That was my understanding of your previous e-mail, but thanks for having made it explicit. Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
